Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Twinkle, twinkle, little star
How I wonder what you are
It’s not easy to tell a star from a planet when you look up at the
night sky. Ancient astronomers noted that some lights moved across the
sky, while others appeared to remain in a fixed position. The Greeks,
picking up the work of these earlier scientists, called such a
travelling point of light
planēs – wanderer. We still call them planets today.
But other than orbiting around a star, what makes a planet a planet? As telescopes become
more sophisticated
and we learn more about the universe, the less some old definitions
make sense. We now know that some planets are rocky, like Earth, while
others are so-called gas giants, like Jupiter.
We also know that our middle-aged Sun is one type of a variety of
stars, classified by their phase in a lifecycle we are still in the
process of understanding. A star shines by producing its own light from
nuclear fusion in its dense, hot core. Planets shine—to our eyes on
Earth—by reflecting the light of stars.
These were the simple, sharp definitions of stars and planets until
the discovery of a brown dwarf in 1995. Theorized as early as the 1960s,
this new type of celestial body blurred the line between star and
planet, requiring an exciting re-thinking of the universe.
An
artist’s depiction of the relative sizes of the Sun, a low mass star, a
brown dwarf, Jupiter, and the Earth. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCB
Despite their name, brown dwarfs can be up to 70 times more massive
than gas giants like Jupiter. Brown dwarfs form like stars do, by the
contraction of gas that collapses into a dense core under the force of
its own gravity, whereas planets form from the accumulation of leftover
debris from these stellar births. However, brown dwarfs do not have
enough mass for their cores to burn nuclear fuel and radiate starlight.
This is why they are sometimes referred to as “failed stars.” They are
smaller and cooler than the Sun, and have complex planet-like outer
atmospheres, including clouds and molecules such as H
2O.
Astronomers now disagree on whether some “free-floating” bodies detected
in space – not orbiting a star, but also not shining like a star –
should be called planets or brown dwarfs.
A brown dwarf atmosphere is easier to study than that of an
exoplanet, which is typically obscured in the blinding light of its
parent star. But to study brown dwarfs you first have to find them.
Their dim light makes this difficult, and eventually the visible light
left over from their birth fades completely beyond the red end of the
visible spectrum, and they emit only infrared light.
Credit: STScI
Difficult to detect, brown dwarfs hint at the many undiscovered wonders
the universe still holds, hidden for centuries beyond the bounds of
visible light. Much of the mass that holds the universe together with
its gravity has thus far been undetectable, and is known as dark matter.
In 2019, the James Webb Space Telescope will continue the work of
NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope and infrared Spitzer Space Telescope in
probing the furthest and “darkest” regions of the universe. Webb will
see farther and in higher resolution, with unprecedentedly powerful
infrared cameras and spectrographs. When Hubble launched, the only
planets we knew of were those in our own Solar System. There were no
images of brown dwarfs. Webb will take a detailed look at the
atmospheres of brown dwarfs and exoplanets, determining their
temperatures and chemical compositions.
Do the traditional boundaries between planets and stars still make
sense? Once purely philosophical, these questions now loom large in
science. With infrared observations, the Webb Telescope will add to our
understanding of the universe’s ongoing evolution, and the place of
Earth and our Solar System within that bigger picture.
No comments:
Post a Comment