When black holes collide, look out! The "kick" from an enormous
burst of gravitational radiation that occurs during the collision could
knock a black hole clear out of its galaxy, rather than resulting in one
massive black hole, as commonly thought. New theoretical simulations by
Astrophysicist David Merritt of the Rochester Institute of Technology,
and colleagues, determined how much kick the black holes get from the mergers
and then compared this with the escape velocities from galaxies that
could harbor merged black holes. They found that larger and brighter
galaxies have stronger gravitational fields and would require a bigger
kick to eject a black hole than the smaller systems. Likewise, less
forceful impacts could jar the black hole out of its home at the center
of a galaxy, only to later rebound back into position. The researchers
say that the kicks call into question theories that would grow
supermassive black holes from hierarchical mergers of smaller black
holes, starting in the early universe.
The researchers relied on a series of Hubble Space Telescope
discoveries to reach this conclusion. Hubble has previously shown that
supermassive black holes are common in galaxies. Hubble has also shown
that galaxies were smaller long ago. This means that the black hole
kicks would easily have removed the black holes from smaller galaxies.
"It's more likely that supermassive black holes attained most of their
mass through the accretion of gas. Mergers with other black holes only
took place after the galaxies had reached roughly their current sizes,"
says Merritt.
Merritt notes that while there is no observational evidence that the kicks have taken place, they could explain the lack of black holes in dwarf galaxies and globular clusters. He contends that the best chance of finding direct evidence would be locating a black hole shortly after the kick occurs, perhaps in a galaxy that has recently undergone a merger with another galaxy. "You would see an off-center black hole that hasn't quite made its way back to the center yet," he says. "Even though the probability of observing this is low, now that astronomers know what to look for, I wouldn't be surprised if someone finds one eventually."
The science team's article, "Consequences of Gravitational Radiation Recoil," has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal. The article was supported by funding from the Space Telescope Science Institute and appears online.
Merritt notes that while there is no observational evidence that the kicks have taken place, they could explain the lack of black holes in dwarf galaxies and globular clusters. He contends that the best chance of finding direct evidence would be locating a black hole shortly after the kick occurs, perhaps in a galaxy that has recently undergone a merger with another galaxy. "You would see an off-center black hole that hasn't quite made its way back to the center yet," he says. "Even though the probability of observing this is low, now that astronomers know what to look for, I wouldn't be surprised if someone finds one eventually."
The science team's article, "Consequences of Gravitational Radiation Recoil," has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal. The article was supported by funding from the Space Telescope Science Institute and appears online.
No comments:
Post a Comment